The nominal compression stress and strain are respectively determ

The nominal compression stress and strain are respectively determined by: (4) (5) where R particle is the initial radius of particle, P plate is the total reactive force of beads onto the plate, D is the displacement of the plate, and D 0 is the gap distance between the plate and particle prior to compression. Figure 4b presents the nominal compression stress–strain curves of the PE particles with different chain architectures. In general, highly nonlinear stress–strain behaviors Anlotinib chemical structure are observed which resulted from the change in contact area during the simulation as well as the usual increase in hydrostatic

loading during compression, similar to experimental observations [19–21]. Four different regimes of compression behaviors can be identified from Figure 4b. In the first regime, it is observed that the slope of

the compression stress–strain curve has a sudden change at a strain around 0.06. This MLN2238 regime is primarily associated with the compression of the outer surface of Selleckchem GS-4997 the particle, which has a mass density that is lower than the inner bulk-level density and a depth of the interfacial thickness. As the applied deformation approaches a strain of 0.06, this lower density region becomes highly compressed and the overall compressive load starts transferring to the denser material under the surface. The second regime begins with the sudden increase in load due to this transfer of load to the denser subsurface. This behavior in this regime is similar to that observed in the initial phase of compression of micron-sized polymeric particles [19–21], in which the ratio of surface eltoprazine thickness to radius is very small. The third regime is associated with brief window strain softening, as indicated by the gray-shaded region in Figure 4b. This behavior is caused by an increase in molecular rearrangements that serve to temporarily relax the applied compressive load. In the fourth regime, significant

hardening occurs that is typical of uniaxial compression testing of polymers. This hardening is associated with the buildup of hydrostatic compressive forces within the particle. The effective compression moduli from the first, second, and fourth regimes were obtained by fitting the initial linear portions of the curves and are listed in Table 2. Comparison of these moduli for different chain architectures for each regime indicates that the stiffness of the network polymeric particle is consistently higher than that of the branched particle, which is consistently higher than that of the linear chain particle for all of the regimes. Therefore, the chain architecture plays a leading role on the compression behavior of PE nanoparticles. Figure 4 Compression stress and compression strain. (a) Schematic of the compression simulation of nanoscale PE particles. Beads are colored according to the molecular number. (b) Compressive stress–strain behaviors of PE nanoparticles with different molecular structures. Bold lines are the average of particle response.

Comments are closed.