This correlates with our previous analysis [17] This study has s

This correlates with our previous analysis [17]. This study has several limitations. It is retrospective in nature, with significant patient heterogeneity, includes only a small number of cases, and not all specimens were appropriate for molecular analysis (a common finding in several NSCLC studies [12]). We have also combined patients treated with gefitinib and erlotinib. Despite these limitations EGFR status was once again demonstrated to be a predictor for disease control and PFS, and KRAS a poor predictive marker. Although our study did not identify any other provisional candidate biomarker of response or resistance, due to the small size of the study and the inevitable

relapse of virtually all patients it is now time to investigate, in a prospective selleck compound manner, the role of several biomarkers of acquired and de-novo resistance in light of the routine clinical testing for EGFR status. References 1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225–249.PubMedCrossRef 2. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al.: Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:92–98.PubMedCrossRef 3. Laskin JJ, Sandler AB: Epidermal growth factor receptor: a promising target in solid tumours. Cancer Treat Rev 2004, 30:1–17.PubMedCrossRef selleck chemicals 4. Ciardiello F, Tortora G: EGFR

antagonists in cancer treatment. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:1160–1174.PubMedCrossRef 5. Meert AP, Martin B, Delmotte P, Berghmans T, Lafitte JJ, this website Mascaux C, et al.: The role of EGF-R expression on patient survival in lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2002, 20:975–981.PubMedCrossRef

6. Hirsch FR, Bunn PA Jr: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in lung cancer: smaller or larger molecules, selected or unselected populations? J Clin Oncol 2005,23(36):9044–9047.PubMedCrossRef 7. Pal SK, Figlin RA, Reckamp K: Targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer: an evolving landscape. Mol Cancer Ther 2010, 9:1931–1944.PubMedCrossRef 8. Takano T, Ohe Y: Erlotinib in lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:1739–1741. author reply 1739–1741PubMedCrossRef 9. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al.: EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004, 304:1497–1500.PubMedCrossRef 10. Sordella the R, Bell DW, Haber DA, Settleman J: Gefitinib-sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung cancer activate anti-apoptotic pathways. Science 2004, 305:1163–1167.PubMedCrossRef 11. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al.: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2129–2139.PubMedCrossRef 12. Linardou H, Dahabreh IJ, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Murray S: Somatic EGFR mutations and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 2009, 6:352–366.

Comments are closed.