However, subsequent use of interview data KU55933 yielded feedback from patients and was useful in determining whether any relevant concepts were missing from the instrument. One final point relates to the number of participants interviewed in phase 2 of this study. This number (n = 32) might appear to be low, but this is typical of qualitative research. Moreover, the crucial criterion for achieving an acceptable value of ‘n’ in this type of research is the demonstration

of data saturation having been achieved [21]. This was the case in both the first and second stages of phase 2. The version of OPAQ that we have developed represents a useful advance for both researchers and patients. For researchers, a PRO instrument now exists that focuses solely on the mobility, physical position, and transfer aspects of physical function in patients with osteoporosis or low

bone mass density. For patients, Selleckchem RG7112 the small number of items reduces the burden associated with completion of the instrument compared with others that may be used. The use of IRT and qualitative www.selleckchem.com/products/gsk923295.html concept elicitation, and cognitive debriefing interviews, combined with the clinical expertise of two of the authors (DTG, SS), resulted in the development of a concise PRO instrument that focuses on the impact of osteoporosis on physical function before and after a fracture event. Content validity of the OPAQ-PF has been established in fracture and nonfracture osteoporosis patients in the USA. We are currently conducting a psychometric validation study using OPAQ-PF to evaluate validity (including the ability of the OPAQ-PF to discriminate between those with fracture vs. those without), reliability, and sensitivity Edoxaban to change. Additionally, due to the comorbidities often seen in patients with osteoporosis that are associated with older age, it may be necessary to adjust for the presence of musculoskeletal or other related comorbidities when conducting analyses of OPAQ-PF data. Further research is needed to confirm the need for statistical adjustments. Conclusions The OPAQ-PF represents

a new PRO tool that is uniquely tailored to the assessment of physical function in osteoporosis patients. The cohort used to develop the instrument included patients both with and without a history of fracture, and content validity was established in this patient group. This provides evidence that OPAQ-PF has relevance in a combined fracture/nonfracture population. Once psychometrically validated in a range of osteoporotic patient populations, OPAQ-PF will offer researchers a valid, reliable, and sensitive instrument that will be useful in clinical trials to evaluate pharmacological therapies that aim to reduce fracture risk and promote bone formation following fracture. Acknowledgments This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company.