2E). In RAW-control cells, laminarin, but not mannan, almost completely inhibited the oxidative burst (Fig. 3A), suggesting that Dectin-1 is a major element in eliciting the oxidative burst in the RAW-control cells. In contrast,

laminarin had little effect on the oxidative burst in RAW-SIGNR1 cells, whereas mannan significantly decreased it, and it was further reduced with the simultaneous addition of laminarin. Adriamycin mw Such a cooperative action between SIGNR1 and Dectin-1 was also proven using respective specific mAbs (Fig. 3B). These results strengthen the possibility that SIGNR1 and Dectin-1 cooperate to induce an oxidative burst in the RAW-SIGNR1 cells. Since Dectin-1 transduces intracellular signaling using Syk kinase 14, the effects of a specific Syk kinase inhibitor, piceatannol, were examined. As expected, piceatannol effectively and totally abolished the oxidative burst in the RAW-control as well as RAW-SIGNR1 cells (Fig. 3C). Moreover, live microbes cultured with RAW-SIGNR1 cells formed fewer colonies than those with Crizotinib purchase RAW-control cells (Fig. 3D). This enhanced candidacidal activity in RAW-SIGNR1 cells was again markedly inhibited by piceatannol (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, the deletion

of most of the carbohydrate recognition domain (ΔCRD) as well as the substitution of Glu with Gln (E285Q) in the EPN motif of CRD in the SIGNR1 gene diminished the augmented oxidative response (Fig. 3F), indicating that CRD-mediated recognition of microbes by SIGNR1 is crucial for the enhanced response. In contrast, cytosolic portion was dispensable in the activity (Fig. 3F). Taken together, these results suggest that efficient recognition of the microbes by SIGNR1 facilitates Dectin-1-mediated signaling possibly through Syk, leading to an enhanced intracellular oxidative burst against HK-C. albicans. In order to define any impact of SIGNR1 more directly, we titrated the dose of microbes during the culture with RAW-SIGNR1 and RAW-control cells using fluoresceinated HK-C. albicans. Results showed that RAW-SIGNR1 more efficiently

captured microbes (Fig. 4A and B) and produced higher levels of response than RAW-control cells (Fig. 4A). When the oxidative burst of RAW-SIGNR1 was compared with control cells under equivalent capturing Selleckchem Verteporfin efficiency conditions, e.g. RAW-SIGNR1 with 1.25×105 microbes (7.93%) versus RAW-control with 5×105 microbes (7.98%), a higher oxidative response was evident in the former (Fig. 4C left panel) and a larger number of the former showed strong oxidative response than the latter (Fig. 4C right panel). These results support the hypothesis that SIGNR1 not only plays a role in capturing microbes with high contact efficiency but also facilitates the induction of the oxidative response. To clarify functions of SIGNR1 in situ, rpMϕ with high autofluorescence intensity (Fig. 4D left panel) were employed. SIGNR1 on rpMϕ was successfully downregulated by 1 day after i.v.