93) No significant difference was identified between real-time p

93). No significant difference was identified between real-time protocols with free breathing and those with breath holding for measurement of volumetric parameters.\n\nConclusion: Accelerated real-time 2D and segmented 3D cine techniques are comparable to the standard clinical protocol in assessment of left ventricular global and regional parameters in substantially shorter image times. (C) RSNA, 2009″
“The morphological characteristics and the cuttlebone formation of Sepia esculenta exposed to different water temperature fluctuations were investigated under laboratory conditions. Temperature fluctuation

cycles (15 cycles, 60 d in total) consisted of the following three regimes of 4 d duration: GS-7977 manufacturer keeping water temperature in 26A selleck degrees

C for 3 d (Group A), 2 d (Group B), 0 d (Group C, control); then keeping water temperature in 16A degrees C for the next 1, 2, 4 d. No significant difference in the survival rate was observed between the control and temperature fluctuation groups (P > 0.05). Lamellar depositions in a temperature fluctuation cycle were 2.45 +/- 0.02 for Group A, 2.00 +/- 0.02 for Group B, and 1.78 +/- 0.02 for Group C (P < 0.05). The relationship between age and number of lamellas in the cuttlebone of S. esculenta under each water temperature fluctuation could be described as the linear model and the number of lamellas in the cuttlebone did not correspond to actual age. Group A had the highest cuttlebone growth index (CGI), the lowest locular index (LI), and inter-streak distances comparing with those of control group. However, the number of lamellas and LI or CGI showed a quadratic relationship for each temperature fluctuation group. In addition, temperature fluctuations caused the breakage of cuttlebone dark rings, which was considered a thermal mark. PF-562271 The position of the breakage in the dark rings was random. This thermal mark can be used as supplementary information for marking and releasing techniques.”
“This study was performed to evaluate the effect of different cereal source in choice feeding systems on performance and on emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) and

enteric methane (CH4) in dairy Awassi ewes. Total 16 dairy ewes were divided into two groups: the corn based free choice (CFC) group received feed ingredients separately (corn, wheat bran, soybean meal (SBM), cottonseed meal (CSM) and alfalfa hay) and the barley based free choice group (BFC) group received barley instead of corn as carbon hydrate source. The results showed no significant differences (p>0.05) between treatments in live weight, live weight gain, milk yield, milk composition and CO, production. However, the results of CH4 measurement indicated significant differences between groups in the amounts of CH4 produced. The ewes in the CFC group produced less CH4 than the ewes that received the BFC system (CFC: 21.82; BFC: 38.

Comments are closed.