A dilution series of concentrated supernatant was also prepared i

A dilution series of concentrated supernatant was also prepared in GMEM and added to non-infected mouse blood, then extracted with ‘RNA Now’, to determine the correlation between PFU and real-time RT-PCR ‘cycle threshold’ (Ct) values (to allow estimates of PFU-equivalents, only when BTV RNA was detected by RT-PCR but no virus could be isolated from blood samples). The presence of viraemia was ‘assessed’ by BTV serogroup-specific real-time RT-PCR targeting Seg-1 [37] and virus isolation on BSR GSI-IX clinical trial and KC cells. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) between groups of mice, was carried out using Minitab-16 software (Minitab Inc., UK), or the Systat-5.03 program (Systat Inc., Evanston,

IL). Statistical significance between groups was assessed by a general linear model using Tukey’s test (differences are considered as statistically significant when P < 0.05). Expression of GST-fused domains VP2D1 (aa 63–471) and VP2D2 (aa 555–955) in C41 bacteria at 28 °C enhanced their solubility (∼30% soluble proteins) (Fig. 1A). The yields of soluble GST-fused VP2 domains were similar batch to batch at ∼0.5 mg/ml (1 ml of protein from 100 ml of bacterial culture). Deletion of aa 1–100, which forms part of the coiled-coils selleck compound NH2-terminal structure (VP5Δ1–100) dramatically increased solubility (Fig.

1B) (∼60% soluble protein), yielding 1.5 mg/ml of protein (1 ml of protein from 100 ml of bacterial culture). Deletion of residues beyond aa 100 caused no further improvement in solubility. The expressed BTV-4-VP7(T13)/GST-fusion protein was soluble (Fig. 1C) at a concentration of ∼1 mg/ml (1 ml of protein from 100 ml of bacterial culture). Standard curves were generated to compare Ct values from real-time RT-PCR assays, with virus titres (PFU/ml) for BTV-4 and BTV-8 preparations. Both curves show a high correlation (R2 values of 0.988 and 0.997 respectively). The number of PFU-equivalents for BTV-4 or BTV-8 in mouse blood can be calculated from the formulas y = −1.667ln(x) + 37.874 (BTV-4) or y = −1.772ln(x) + 38.082

(BTV-8), where y is the Ct value determined by whatever real time PCR assay and x is the number of PFU-equivalents/ml. The value of x will be x = e(y−37.874)/(−1.667) for BTV-4, or x = e(y−38.082)/(−1.772) for BTV-8, where e = 2.71828 is the base of natural logarithm. Results were consistent when BTV-4 or BTV-8 were grown in different batches of BSR cells. Otherwise, number of PFU was determined by virus isolation on BSR cells. CAPS-denatured BTV-4 VP2 domain 1 and 2/GST-fusion proteins raised antibodies which detected a ∼110 kDa protein (corresponding to VP2) in a BTV-4(SPA2003/01) infected-cell lysate, by Western-blotting (Fig. 1d). They also detected inactivated BTV antigen in ELISA (Table 1), but failed to neutralise BTV-4(SPA2003/01).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>