Data are shown as average ± SD, from two independent experiments

Data are shown as average ± SD, from two independent experiments (N = 8 mice per group). Statistically significant differences among treatments by the Dunn’s multiple comparison test Smad family (p < 0.05) were indicated by different lowercase letters (“a” or “b”) above the error bars. (NC) negative Selleckchem Captisol control group; (Bov) mice treated with bovicin HC5; (PC) positive control group. In PC group, the jejunum segments demonstrated a significant increase (p

< 0.05) in the number of mast cells from the mucosa and submucosa (Figure 7), when compared to Bov and NC groups. In the small intestine of animals from the Bov group, significant villous atrophy accompanied by villi enlargement was observed. In PC group, the increase of the villous diameter was even more pronounced when compared to the Bov group (p < 0.05), although the height of the villi was not altered, when compared to RXDX-101 chemical structure NC group (Figure 8). Figure 8 Morphometric analysis of the small intestinal villi. Panel (A) and panel (B) show the height and diameter of

the small intestinal villi, respectively. Data were shown as average ± SD, from two independent experiments (N = 8 mice per group). Statistically significant differences among treatments by the Dunn’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05) were indicated by different lowercase letters (“a”, “b” or “c”) above the error bars. (NC) negative control group; (Bov) mice treated with bovicin HC5; (PC) positive control group. The large intestine of the NC group was normal and with a homogenous aspect (Figure 9A and 9B). The effects of bovicin HC5 and ovalbumin were less DNA ligase evident in the large intestine of the animals. No differences on epithelium structure or cellularity were detected in Bov group (Figure 9C), while a moderate edema at the lamina propria (Figure 9D) and a significant reduction at the mucosal thickness (Figure 10) were detected among the animals from the PC group (p < 0.05). Figure 9 Photomicrographs of longitudinal sections

of large intestine of the experimental groups. Large intestine segments were collected and processed for optical microscopy analysis at the end of the experiment (day 58) (N = 8 mice per group). (NC), negative control group, figures A and B; (Bov) mice treated with bovicin HC5, figure C; (PC) positive control group, figure D. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE; figure A) or PAS/Alcian Blue (figures B-D). Abbreviations: EP: simple cuboidal epithelium; LP: lamina propria; MT: mucosal thickness; E: edema; ML: muscle layer. Red arrow head indicates goblet cells. Scale bar = 200 (figure A) or 100 μm (figures B, C and D). Figure 10 Comparison of the mucosal thickness of the large intestine among the experimental groups. Data are shown as average ± SD, from two independent experiments (N = 8 mice per group). Statistically significant differences among treatments by the Dunn’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05) were indicated by different lowercase letters (“a” or “b”) above the error bars.

Comments are closed.