Figure 2 HTXRD pattern of Al 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 film (5:5 nm) in the temperature range 300-1273 K. The peak at 60° (2θ) indicates reflection from the substrate holder. Alumina influences the growth of the zirconia layer and provides a template for the stabilization of the metastable phase of zirconia. The layer
click here thickness is the most important influencing parameter on the stabilization of tetragonal zirconia. The critical thickness of the metastable phase depends on a combination of bulk free energy, interfacial energy, and surface energy [22]. When the layers are very thin, the interfacial and surface energies dominate both bulk and strain energy terms, which could promote the formation Smoothened Agonist of a metastable phase with a low interfacial
energy. This study demonstrates the feasibility of stabilizing the metastable zirconia phase by the suitable selection of thickness of zirconia layer using the template layer of 5- and 10-nm-thick U0126 datasheet alumina. In these Al2O3/ZrO2 nanolaminates, Al2O3 has negligible solubility in zirconia; however, it forms a rigid matrix around the ZrO2 crystals which causes a local compressive stress and hinders the phase transformation. Also, Al2O3 has almost twice the elastic constant (approximately 390 GPa) compared to that of ZrO2 (approximately 207 GPa). This high elastic constant provides structural stability for the tetragonal phase of zirconia [23]. If the ZrO2 layer thickness Methocarbamol is ≤10 nm, it is possible to stabilize the tetragonal phase at room temperature.
If the ZrO2 layer thickness is exceeding 10 nm, the Al2O3 layer is not able to provide enough local compressive stress to suppress the monoclinic phase [18]. This critical layer thickness depends on the deposition method and parameters used in the deposition. In the present work, all the films showed the t-ZrO2 and there was no phase transformation. PLD is also a non-equilibrium process, and thermodynamic considerations may strongly influence both phase formation within layers and at interfaces. HRTEM and AFM analyses Figure 3 shows a cross-sectional view of the as-deposited 5:10-nm film on Si (100) substrates. The cross-sectional TEM was performed to determine the structure of the as-deposited multilayers. It is noticed from the figure that the individual layers are well defined, flat, and of uniform thickness. ZrO2 layers appear dark in the bright-field image, while Al2O3 layers are bright. The average layer thickness of Al2O3 and ZrO2 are measured to be 5.2 and 10.5 nm, respectively. The inset shows the selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern recorded from the multilayer. The intense spots are from the silicon substrate, while the diffuse rings indicate a surface oxide layer. It is observed that the ZrO2 layer shows lattice fringes and consist of mainly tetragonal phase and one or two monoclinic ZrO2 crystallites.