One experiment looked at the relative amounts of mRNA using real-time RTq-PCR. All mRNA species were detectable, with cysQ being most abundant (approximately

the same level as sigA, the major housekeeping sigma factor), www.selleckchem.com/products/ganetespib-sta-9090.html and impA being the least abundant, with a level only one-tenth that of cysQ. We also assayed the level of IMPase activity in the whole cell extracts of each mutant, reasoning that we might see a decrease in activity when one of the genes was deleted. However, no decrease in activity was observed in any of the three mutants compared to the wild-type strain. This could be a reflection on the sensitivity of our assay, or could indicate that the activity is regulated (either at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level) such that a constant level is maintained. We also have preliminary check details data that expression of the impC gene is regulatable. We grew a Δino1 mutant of M. tuberculosis (which needs >50 mM inositol for its normal growth [23]) and looked at the effect of removal of the inositol on gene expression. The only IMPase

gene with changed expression was impC, which was 3-fold increased. We cannot link this change directly to the inositol, BAY 80-6946 cell line because it could also be caused by the change in osmolarity, but at the very least indicates this indicates this gene is regulatable (unpublished results). The situation with impC is complicated in that we could neither obtain a mutant, nor do we have biochemical evidence that it functions as an IMPase (despite many attempts to achieve both). The essentiality cannot be a simple case of impC producing the majority of the inositol in the cell, as we added inositol exogenously. It is true that the ino1 mutant we made previously, which is an inositol auxotroph, required Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) levels of inositol approaching the maximum solubility limit, so a requirement for a slightly increased level of inositol might explain our

findings. However, this is unlikely because (i) we also introduced a porin gene to increase inositol uptake, with no effect, (ii) we would also have to explain why the other three IMPase genes are not sufficient, and (iii) the level of impC mRNA is only 21% of the total IMPase mRNA (41% if cysQ is excluded). The only pieces of evidence we have, therefore, that link impC to inositol production are (i) its clear homology to IMPases, and (ii) the circumstantial evidence that levels of impC increased in a microarray experiment where inositol was removed from an ino1 auxotroph, whereas the expression level of the other IMPase genes was not significantly changed. We recognise the difficulty of carrying out the latter experiment in a controlled way since removing such a high level of inositol from the medium could have other effects. Interestingly, impC was also upregulated in the Wayne low oxygen model, particularly when M.