\n\nPractice description: Ambulatory pharmacies in the United States.\n\nPractice innovation: Superbills have been used by physicians
and other health care providers for many years as a way of efficiently communicating to the office staff, the patient, and even the insurer the types of services PLX3397 supplier that have been provided at the point of care. The profession of pharmacy has not routinely used superbills in the past; however, given the recognition of pharmacists as providers of medication therapy management (MTM) services, immunizations, disease management, and other specialty preventive health services, the time has come for pharmacists to begin using superbills.\n\nMain outcome measures: Not applicable.\n\nResults: A sample superbill, suitable for adaptation by individual providers Selisistat price of medication therapy
management and other clinical pharmacy services, is provided in this article.\n\nConclusion: Superbills may or may not improve the pharmacist’s overall ability to receive insurance remuneration, but the authors believe that greater recognition by patients of the nondispensing activities of pharmacists can be achieved by using a superbill and that this may lead to more opportunities for payment for MTM in the future. Research is needed to assess whether incorporating superbills into a variety of pharmacy practice settings improves patient perceptions of the pharmacist and to discover how superbills effect practice efficiency.”
“Background: The impact of a German University ENT emergency unit has not been investigated yet. The present study had the aim to define the role of such an ENT emergency unit for the medical supply of ENT emergency cases. Patients’ characteristics, diagnostics and
therapeutical processes have been analysed.\n\nMethods: In a retrospective study 3 695 emergency cases of the year 2004 have been characterized.\n\nResults: Patients referring to the ENT emergency unit selleck chemicals are relative young with an average age of 36 years. 72% are coming from the urban area. Two thirds referred themselves without seeing another physician before. The spectrum of diagnoses was broad, mainly similar to the normal spectrum of diseases seen in daily outpatient practice. 17% were emergency cases in narrower sense needing direct help because of real threat. 25% of the patients needed more than a clinical ENT examination. 9% of the cases were admitted to the hospital.\n\nDiscussion: In a major city without specialised outpatient ENT emergency system patient are attracted regularly to present at the University ENT emergency unit. This means a significant work load for the resident on duty. Most of the patients have ENT diseases treatable with this one and last patient contact. On the other hand, the hospital recruits an important amount of patients for inpatient treatment through the emergency unit.”
“1. The timing of seasonal activity (i.e.