Serum MMCP-1 has been shown to be a marker for

mucosal ma

Serum MMCP-1 has been shown to be a marker for

mucosal mastocytosis and increased gut permeability [32] as well as for mast cell dependent intestinal inflammation [33]. A strong correlation between anaphylactic score and levels of MMCP-1 was found. However, cross-allergy did not reveal any signs of mast cell activation, as the levels of MMCP-1 in animals challenged with cross-reactive legumes were comparable with the levels of immunized, not challenged animals. This suggests GSK-3 phosphorylation that intestinal mast cells are less activated in the cross-allergic reactions observed. It has been reported that food induced anaphylaxis may depend more on macrophages and basophils than on mast cells [34], and more studies are needed to elucidate the roles of macrophages and basophils in cross-allergy. That no cross-reactivity could be observed in the PCA-test may also support the notion that cross-allergic reactions are not mediated through a mast cell dependent pathway. However, because of the functionality of the test, it could also be a reflection of the difference in affinity between epitopes. Two distinct mechanisms have been reported to induce systemic anaphylaxis in the mouse [35]. The classical pathway is mediated by allergen cross linking of IgE bound to the high affinity receptor (FcεRI) on mast cells. The alternative

pathway is thought to involve macrophages, FcγRIII, IgG antibodies and platelet activating factor [36]. A partial inhibition GNAT2 of lupin specific IgG1 by peanut and soy and of fenugreek specific IgG1 by peanut was observed. A role for both IgE and Ku-0059436 cost IgG1 in the cross-allergic responses in mice is therefore possible. Several studies have implied that both the classical and the alternative pathway of food induced anaphylaxis are involved simultaneously in mice, and that abrogation of one pathway only partially abrogates anaphylactic responses [37–39]. Tsujimura

et al. [40] demonstrated that basophils play a crucial role in IgG mediated anaphylaxis in their mouse model. It has also been reported that mast cells contribute to anaphylaxis through both IgE and IgG1, whereas macrophages contribute through IgG1 exclusively. The role of IgG1 in anaphylactic reactions in mice complicates the extrapolation of findings from mouse to man, as IgG-mediated anaphylaxis to food has not yet been described in man. The relevance to human anaphylaxis of the different pathways observed in mice needs to be investigated. Strait et al. have shown that although the IgE pathway is more sensitive and requires lower threshold levels of antigen for full activation, IgG mediated responses can also be severe [36, 41]. Our studies support the involvement of IgG1 in cross-allergy, while we were unable to confirm the involvement of IgE and mast cells.

Comments are closed.