The adenomatous polyp is regarded as a marker of a neoplasm-prone

The adenomatous polyp is regarded as a marker of a neoplasm-prone colon. The incidence of new adenomas in series of surveillance colonoscopies ranges from 16% to 41% depending on individuals risk status. The incidence of adenomas/ carcinomas in patients with CRC undergoing surveillance colonoscopy see more is unknown. We audited consecutive surveillance colonoscopies

done in patients with CRC at Tata Memorial Hospital over 2 years (2012–2013). We evaluated the yield of polyps /cancers. Methods: 373 consecutive patients with CRC who had completed treatment underwent an unsedated surveillance colonoscopy after standard bowel preparation. Patient demographics and colonoscopy findings were reviewed. Data was collected prospectively and analysed. Results: The mean age was 52 years (range 15–82 yrs). There were 247 (66%) males. The site of primary tumor was in the anorectum in 186 and colon in 187 (50% each). The bowel preparation was graded subjectively as good in 22 (6%), fair in 267 (72%) and poor in 40 (11%). 327 (88%) subjects underwent a complete colonoscopy. Common reasons for incomplete colonoscopy were stenotic tumor/ stricture in 15 (4%), poor bowel preparation in 10 (2.7%) and abdomen discomfort/pain or excessive looping in 19 (5%). 18 subjects (5%) had metachronous tumors with one subject having 3 tumors. 24 (6.4%) had polyps

of which 4 (1.1%) had multiple polyps. 13 polyps (3.5%) were tubular adenomas, 11 (2.9%) were tubulovillous adenomas and 3 (0.8%) were hyperplastic polyps. Protease Inhibitor Library clinical trial 1 subject each had a non hodgkins lymphoma and a serrated adenoma. Conclusion: Of the subjects undergoing surveillance colonoscopy, 18 (5%) had a metachronous cancer in the colon and 24 (6.4%) had a polyp. 1 subject was diagnosed

to have a second tumor (lymphoma). 12% patients could not have a complete colonoscopy. Key Word(s): 1. colorectal cancer; 2. surveillance; 3. colonoscopy; 4. yield Presenting Author: LING FEI WU Additional Authors: WEI DENG, MENG QI XIANG, LI XUAN LIU, XIAO TAO ZHOU, PEI RUI CHEN, LING FEI WU Corresponding Author: LING FEI WU Affiliations: Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Med, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Med, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Med, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Med, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Med, Second Affiliated Hospital, GNA12 Shantou University Med Objective: The aim of the present study was to confirm whether long non-coding RNA MEG3 is downregulated, determine its possible mechanism of action and elucidate the role of MEG3 in human HCC. Methods: Differences in the expression of MEG3 and in the methylation status of the MEG3 promoter were analyzed in HCC tissues and HepG2 cell line using RT-PCR and methylation-specific PCR (MSP), respectively. CCK-8 assay and colony formation assays were used to assess the effect of MEG3 on cell proliferation; Flow cytometric analysis was used to evaluate the cell apoptosis. PcDNA 3.

Comments are closed.