However, only a limited number of included studies presented 95% CI. In these cases, lower limits never indicated acceptable reliability and most CI were quite wide suggesting low sample sizes. None of the included studies reported an a priori sample size calculation. We conclude that inter-rater reliability of measurement of passive physiological movements in lower extremity joints is generally low. Future research should focus on determining the
role and position of measurements of passive movements in extremity joints within clinical reasoning and decision-making. In addition, the inter-rater reliability of measurements of passive physiological hip and see more ankle range of motion in particular and of measurements of end-feel should be further investigated. Careful consideration should be given to uniform standardisation of measurement procedures and to ensuring stability of participants’ and raters’ characteristics during research. Sample size calculations should be performed. Finally, click here following the STARD statement will also improve the quality of reporting of reliability studies (Bossuyt et al 2003a, Bossuyt et al
2003b). Awaiting new evidence, clinicians should be cautious about relying on results from measurements of passive movements in joints for making decisions about patients with lower extremity disorders. eAddenda: Appendix 1, 2, and 3 available at www.JoP.physiotherapy.asn.au “
“In a systematic review of 35 studies of the incidence and prevalence of low back pain (Hill and Keating 2009), 18 studies provided data on lifetime prevalence. Lifetime prevalence of low back pain gradually increases from 1% at age 7 years, to 12–40% at 12 years (Balague et al 1988, Balague et al 1994). Lifetime prevalence Thymidine kinase continues to increase steadily with age,
almost doubling between 12 and 15 years to reach 39–71%, and continuing to increase into the late teens. Given these high prevalence rates, and that a previous episode of low back pain is a known risk factor for a new episode (Battie and Bigos 1991, Burton et al 2005, Hestbaek et al 2006, Hestbaek et al 2003, Jones and Macfarlane 2005), primary prevention of the first episode of low back pain would appear to be a sensible target. It may be possible to develop strategies to prevent first instance of low back pain if risk factors were understood. Low back pain may be an inherent consequence of a person’s individual genetic factors (Leboeuf-Yde 2004). It may be a consequence of, or influenced by, psychological factors (Balague et al 1999, Cardon and Balague 2004, Leboeuf-Yde 2004). It may be due to loads placed on the body by lifestyle demands and physical activity or school-related activity (Balague et al 1999, Duggleby and Kumar 1997, Jones et al 2003). Identification of modifiable risk factors for future low back pain could help in the development of preventive strategies.