The number of patients who had all the necessary information to calculate the CURB-65 score was 35 patients (8.6%). Patients who had only pneumonia accounted for (20, 57%) and patients with coexisting diseases (15,43%). Coexisting diseases consisted of diabetes and hypertension (3), patients with asthma (4), patients with diabetes mellitus (5), patients with gastritis (1), patients with asthma, and patients with hypertension and ischemic heart disease (2). According to severity assessment, 25 cases were calculated as mild, 7 cases as moderate and 3 cases as severe. In relation to the presence of coexisting diseases 94.4% of admitted children, 54% of admitted

adults and 50% of the admitted elderly occurred due to the coexisting diseases rather than a diagnosis of pneumonia. (310, 77%) were treated by monotherapy. This research highlights the approach to the handling Epacadostat nmr Raf inhibitor of CAP in a hospital in UAE using CURB-65. The presence of coexisting

diseases greatly influenced CAP patient admission and the physicians focused on it more than the severity assessment of pneumonia; a huge number of the cases in this study were admitted (69.5%) due to coexisting diseases among children, adult and elderly in regardless of the pneumonia. In the evaluation of severity assessment, it appears that the CURB-65 model is not well used, as only (8.6%) of the cases have all the criteria measured. Mostly, almost those who visit general practitioners are more likely to have a lower concern about severity assessment evaluation than those who visit specialists; however, the general view is still an underestimation. Guidelines are cited for the purpose of logical procedures and follow up, which leads to an improved quality of life,

better patient care, and optimal resource utilization. It is also important to follow guidelines to enable other healthcare professionals to access and benefit from patient’s files which can be used as an educational tool. When a proper diagnosis is made, then the pharmacist will be able to give proper patient counseling based on accurately assessed patients. Among the 35 patients with full criteria measured according to the standard, 25 cases were considered mild (scored 0–1 using CURB-65) 10 cases were treated as in-patients and15 cases were treated as out-patients. 7 cases were considered moderate (scored 2), 4 of them treated as in-patients and 3 cases were treated as out-patients, and 3 cases were considered severe and treated as in-patients. Of the mild cases that were treated as in-patients, some of them were admitted due to the coexisting diseases (diabetes mellitus, asthma, hypertension and ischemic heart disease) and the others were due to raised vital signs, symptoms or laboratory measurements, such as raised Urea and SBP.